logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.11.10 2016고단1745
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 7, 2016, the Defendant causing property damage: (a) around 04:00 on the ground that she was bad on the street in front of the E hotel located in Yong-Namnam-si, and (b) took a fluorous female driver’s vehicle in the name-free female driver’s name, who was passing the seat, and took a walk; (c) on the ground that she told the victim F, who was a witness, that she “Is the female test” was “this fluor,” and (d) damaged the victim by breaking the glass window and f3,250 won of the repair cost by putting the glass fluor of the G vehicle owned by the victim on his/her hand, thereby damaging it.

2. The Defendant interfered with business by driving the said vehicle while driving the said vehicle at the time, place, and the said victim F (ma, 52 years old) at the time, place specified in paragraph 1, and prevented the vehicle from driving in front of the said vehicle.

Since then, the Defendant expressed from the victim the phrase “this vehicle is an acting engineer, which will not run a business if it prevents this vehicle,” and the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to read “this rings, the death of the driver,” and prevented the victim from moving the front and rear parts of the vehicle by hand for about 15 minutes while continuously blocking the victim’s vehicle for 15 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the proxy driving of the victim by force.

3. On July 7, 2016: (a) around 04:18, the Defendant committed assault against the Defendant, who was asked the Defendant questions about personal information from the police officer I (Nam, 39 years of age) who was called out after receiving 112 a report at the place specified in paragraph (1) and received an inquiry from the police officer I (Nam, South, and 39 years of age) on his/her behalf, saying, “I want to kill him/her or her to do so,” and used the Defendant to walk the I’s buckbuck.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Written Statement;

1. Place of service;

1. Two copies of photographs (piresponding vehicles photographs) shall be subject to the application of the Act.

arrow