[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for six months

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an employee of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”) from around August 2013 to May 2014, who worked as the site leader of civil engineering works and structure construction works among G G construction projects contracted from FY to F (hereinafter referred to as “instant construction site”). Defendant B was in charge of the duty of inspecting the quantity of oil supplied to construction machinery, etc. at the instant construction site from around August 29, 2013 to March 3, 2014. Defendant C was working as the head of a work team supervising daily workers from February 2014 to August 2014.

1. Defendant C’s fraud did not confirm the current status of the human resources invested by the victim F at the construction site of this case on a daily basis, and was committed with intent to obtain money and valuables under the pretext of personnel expenses by falsely claiming personnel expenses for workers who do not actually work by deceiving the victim as requested by the head of the site office by using the circumstance that the personnel expenses shall

On March 2014, the Defendant filed a statement of claim for personnel expenses of KRW 3,780,00 for 25 hours each day at the above construction site and filed with the victim a statement of claim for personnel expenses of KRW 3,780,000 on March 3, 2014 with the victim, although the Defendant claimed for personnel expenses for February with the victim at the above construction site in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, and even though I had not worked as a worker for day duty at the above construction site, I would correct it ex officio because it is obvious that the Defendant was a clerical error.

In addition to the receipt of KRW 3,780,00 as personnel expenses of the above I, from that time to July 2014, the sum of KRW 25,830,000 was paid on six occasions from the damaged person, such as the sequence Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 9 in attached Table 1, from that time, until July 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Defendant A

(a) fraud;