Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 15, 2010, the Defendant prepared a letter of payment with F to the effect that D will repay the above debt on behalf of F when D would not repay the debt to D with the victim E.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on the basis of the above payment letter due to the failure to repay D’s debt, had the Defendant enforce compulsory execution against the Suwon-si G G 166.3 square meters and the above ground buildings owned by the Defendant, and had the injured party forged the above payment letter and filed a false complaint as if it were used.

The defendant around August 5, 2014, for the purpose of having a victim receive criminal punishment at his/her own house, "A has not provided a letter of payment in KRW 30 million from E by the complainant, and the defendant Eul and the complainant do not have a monetary transaction.

E and A have been aware of the same N for a long time at the same NH, and there is a talk about the case if E and A had engaged in money transactions, and I received a favorable judgment by deceiving the complainant in the loan lawsuit at the Suwon District Court at the same time without any contact.

The defendant belongs to the complainant and belongs to the court.

After having made it possible to prepare a written complaint stating false information to the effect that "," the head of the relevant police station in the Suwon-gu Police Station of the same day submitted the above written complaint to the person in charge of the above police station.

On the same day, the defendant was investigated by the I Inspector belonging to the above police station in charge of the above case at the above police station investigation and counseling investigation team office, and "Defendant E was placed on the basis of the letter of payment of KRW 30 million on December 15, 2010, which is the date this case was written, and each payment was forged.

Therefore, the court's winning judgment in favor of the court and 30,000 won property damages to the author, and thus, the complaint is defective in fraud in the lawsuit.

The author is due to the absence of a letter of payment.

"............."