1. The Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff, No. 797, 2014, drafted on June 24, 2014.

According to Gap evidence Nos. 10 and 11, the defendant, on February 2, 2015, prepared a confirmation document stating that "the notary public, by the debtor's offering of real estate security, shall destroy the No. 797 of the 2014 deed prepared by the debtor Eul. The joint and several sureties shall be exempted from the joint and several liability of joint and several sureties. This confirmation document shall take effect upon the completion of the creation of a collateral security on the real estate provided by Eul." On February 4, 2015, Eul prepared a confirmation document stating that "the above confirmation document shall take effect upon the completion of the establishment of a collateral security on the real estate provided by Eul." On February 4, 2015, it is reasonable to view that the defendant completed the registration of the establishment of a collateral security on the third floor of the C-S-Spe C ground C C C C, the maximum amount of claims is KRW 72,00,000,000, and the debtor B, regardless of whether a notary public against the plaintiff was entrusted by the above notarial deed was extinguished.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and accepted.