Text
1. The Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff is a promissory note No. 106, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) On January 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) transferred KRW 100,000,000 to the Plaintiff’s deposit account in the Plaintiff’s National Bank (E) in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of lending money to C on January 22, 2016; (b) the Plaintiff issued a promissory note with the issuer as “C, F, Plaintiff,” and the due date for payment,” and a notary public as “Defendant on February 22, 2016” to the effect that, for the purpose of paying the debt with respect to C, F, and the said money, the Plaintiff issued a notarial deed with the effect that it does not immediately object to compulsory execution, even if having received compulsory execution.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant notarial deed”). (b)
No. 210 of the No. 2016 of the No. 2016 of the No. 2010 of the No. 2016 of the No. 2016 of the No. 2010 of the No. 2010 of the No. 2010 of the No. 2010 of the No. 2010 of the No. 20100 of the No. 20100 of the No. 201000 of the No. 201 of the No. 201 of the No. 2016 of the No. 2010 of the No. 201000 of the No. 201000 of the No. 201000 of the No. 201000 of the No. 20100 of the No. 20100 of the No. 2016 of the No. 2016 of the No.
(hereinafter “notarial deeds”) No. 210, 2016 (hereinafter “notarial deeds”).
Since then, the Defendant received KRW 100,000,000 from the Plaintiff on April 2, 2016, and KRW 100,000 on April 20, 2016, respectively. According to the documentary evidence submitted by the parties, KRW 100,000,000 from the Plaintiff’s deposit account in the above national bank bank account (H) was remitted from April 2, 2016 to F’s deposit account in the Agricultural Cooperative (H) (Evidence No. 7, and April 20, 2016).