Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four years and by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On April 17, 2019, A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. in the Seo-gu District Court's Seo-Support on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 8, 2020.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal (violation of the Educational Environment Protection Act) committed by the Defendants from the end of January 2018 to May 20, 2019, Defendant A managed the said place while working as the head of the said establishment from the end of July 2018 to the end of July 20, 2019, from the end of July 2018 to the end of May 20, 2019, and from the end of July 2019 to the end of May 20, Defendant A operated the Internet trade name “K”, “L”, “M”, and “N” in the name of “K”, and Defendant B is a person in charge of managing the said place as the head of the said establishment from around March 2019 to May 20, 2019 and managing gender purchasing, collecting, cleaning, etc.

No one shall conduct business activities or facilities that are likely to cause sexual acts or similarity in an educational environment protection zone in order to protect the health, sanitation, safety, learning, and educational environment of students.

Nevertheless, Defendant A conspired with Defendant A from the end of January 2018 to May 20, 2019; Defendant B, in collusion with Defendant A from March 2019 to May 20, 2019, was about 75 meters, and 147 meters from each of the above G G buildings H and C buildings D, which are within the educational environment protection zone, and operated the similarity business.

2. Defendant A [Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (a brokerage business, etc.)] operated a business establishment of a tentatively named "kak" as described in the above 1.1., and the Defendant became aware of the fact that the PP of sexual traffic employed by the Defendant at the time of being investigated by the police around May 31, 2018 (a business establishment) was a child or juvenile.

Nevertheless, the Defendant again followed the P around July 25, 2018.