1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The registration of ownership transfer in the name of G, H and I was completed on January 15, 1940 with respect to the land of 6,562 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) in Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun, Gwangju District Court as the receipt No. 284 on January 15, 1940. As to the portion of G, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of J was completed as the receipt of the same court on the same day.

B. Defendant B obtained a certification from K, L, and M that “the instant land is currently being purchased by Defendant B from N on October 10, 1985 and actually owned,” according to the procedure prescribed by the Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Real Estate Ownership, etc. (amended by Act No. 4502 of Nov. 30, 1992, invalidation of December 31, 1994, hereinafter “Special Measures Act”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer as of the instant land by using the said certification certificate, after obtaining a certification from the head of the Gun of the Y on June 14, 1994.”

C. Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant land as the receipt of No. 21555 on October 15, 2018.

Defendant D Union completed on October 23, 2018, respectively, the registration of creation of superficies (the maximum amount of claims KRW 300 million, Defendant C) and the registration of creation of superficies (the ownership of buildings or trees, the entire duration of the land, the duration of the land, the duration of the land from October 23, 2018, and the absence of rent) under the Act No. 22216, Oct. 23, 2018.

E. The plaintiff is one of the I's capital losses.

[Ground of recognition] The items in Gap evidence 1-1, 2, Gap evidence 2-1, 2, 3, 5-1, 5-5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion J, H, and I did not sell the instant land.

In other words, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of Defendant B on the land of this case shall be null and void on the basis of a false certificate issued with a false certificate, and the result shall be that.