A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From around 18:20 on April 10, 2016 to 18:50 on the same day, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, held drunk in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu C1, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim a large amount of the victim’s “Irrecing to enter the restaurant,” and (b) placed the customer in the restaurant with the victim “Irreck, Irre, Irrre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, Irre, I will

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of each statement, each investigation reporting statute;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Special Cases into which the victim has agreed smoothly with the victim);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation (In that the criminal defendant committed the instant crime even though he/she had a record of having been punished several times of crime, such as violence, and thus, there is

[Judgment]