logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.01.15 2013고단61
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a driver of Oralba.

On May 2, 2012, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license for a motorcycle, driven the motorcycleba from the French land to the front side of the road in the original form of the Seopo-dong, Seopopopo-si at the time of Seopopopo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes around the accident site;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and subparagraph 2 of Article 154 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The Defendant is a driver of Obane in the facts charged.

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.065%, driven the above Oralb on May 2, 2012 from 03:02 to 03:02 on May 2, 2012, driving the above Oralb.

2. According to the evidence adopted and examined by the court, the following facts are acknowledged. A.

The Defendant driven the above Obaon and tried to enter the front road, which was installed on the center of the road, shocked down the flowers installed on the road along the left side, and shocked down by driving the above Obaon on the road at the front of the road.

B. After the accident, the Defendant lost consciousness and sent it to the hospital. After the occurrence of the above traffic accident, the security guards E of the Seogpo Police Station confirmed that the Defendant was sent to the Seogpo Medical Center more than 30 minutes after the occurrence of the above traffic accident, and confirmed that the Defendant was not in a situation to consent to blood collection, and as the site of the accident, the blood that the Defendant appears to have come to have come to the front of the above chemical report at the place where the above Ortotoo’s quistains, shocks, shocks, etc. remain at the scene where the Defendant was in danger of the accident, and collected blood by using the blood collection tool in which blood was in a way of blood collection.

C. The above police officer is the National Institute of Scientific Investigation 0.5g of blood taken.

arrow