A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 30, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving on a sound driving), and a fine of KRW 5 million for the same crime at the Seoul Eastern District Court on April 13, 2012, respectively, on January 9, 2014, and on January 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspension of execution and became final and conclusive on January 17, 2014.

1. On January 10, 2015, the Defendant was driving a DNA car under the influence of alcohol of about 1km from the 1km section of approximately 0.151% of blood alcohol concentration to the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day at the port of Yongsan-gu, Busan Metropolitan City to the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day from the day, Seo-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by DD Driving) is a person engaging in driving a DNS car.

On January 10, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car on a 06:33rd day of the day, and proceeded with the road of the Japanese Private School located in the U.S. working in U.S. working-dong in U.S. working-dong in U.S. working-dong in U.S. working-Myeon from the U.S. police station to the U.S. left left at the U.S.

Since there is a zone where a signal is installed, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check the safety of the course by reducing speed and checking well the left and right of the way, and to turn to the left according to the new subparagraph.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and was driven by the victim E (year 71) who was under direct control pursuant to the new subparagraph in the opposite part due to the negligence of left-hand turn in violation of the above duty of care, and received the front portion of the car driving by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.