logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.03.08 2016고단3433
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the chief public knowledge of the D'D' temple in South Yangju City City C.

On April 4, 2016, the Defendant: within D cafeterias around 14:50 on April 4, 2016; in the vicinity of the temple, he/she was in telephone conversationss.

E In order to ask questions about the circumstances of the instant case from G Policemen, a police officer affiliated with the Namyang-ju Police Station Fack Police Station, who was called for 112 as of the date when the Defendant was sleeped and she was sleeped, and called for 112 as of the date when she was sleeped, whether the Defendant asked the said police officer “I Ye, fri slick, slickly, slickly, she asked why she would be asked;

C. Does such spheres are police officers;

It is different from identification card, whether it is the police if a uniform is admitted.

“In doing so, the said police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports was obstructed by assaulting plastic demand bottles on the chest of the said police officer, such as gathering them on the chest of the said police officer, and walking along the chair.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, G, H, and I;

1. Part of the witness J’s legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. Protocols of the public prosecutor and the police statement related to G;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel in the 112 case handling table, the submission of evidence by the Defendant, and attached materials (Sidi)

1. 공소사실과 같이 경찰관을 폭행하지 않았다는 주장에 관한 판단 경찰관 G은 수사기관에서부터 이 법정에 이르기까지 일관하여 이 사건 공소사실 기재와 같이 피고인이 자신에게 욕설을 하면서 요구르트 병을 던져 가슴에 맞았고, 피고인이 플라스틱 의자를 걷어찼다고 진술하였는데, 그 진술이 매우 구체적이고 상세하여 충분히 믿을 만하다.

At that time,

I’s statements are also consistent with this.

피고인도 이 법정과 경찰에서 피해 경찰관을 향해 던진 것은 아니지만 요구르트 병을 식탁에 집어던졌고, 식탁 옆 플라스틱 의자를 걷어찼다 고...

arrow