Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On February 3, 2020, the Defendant: (a) boarded a D taxi operated by the victim C (the 63 years of age and south) in the vicinity of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B apartment; (b) provided the victim’s desire in the process of calculating the summer and fare; and (c) sought the victim’s statement from the victim that “I am hying about hys?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as “h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?h?, the victim’s chest h?h?h?h?
2. Determination
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention (Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act);
C. The victim was not subject to punishment after the prosecution of this case (written application for no punishment on June 11, 2020)
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);