beta
Text
Defendant
All appeals filed by the Defendants of A, B, D, E, F, and G and prosecutor’s appeals are dismissed.
Reasons
... 넘어지면서 N의 다리에 맞았다’( 위 증거 목록 25번 K 지회관련 상황일지 중 109 쪽) 고 기재되어 있고 N의 발목 부위가 멍든 것으로 보이는 사진이 첨부되어 있다( 위 증거기록 115 쪽). N는 2014. 5. 27. 경찰에서 조사 받을 당시에는 ‘D 가 욕설을 하면서 제가 앉아 있는 의자를 발로 차더니 발로 저의 우측 정강이 부위를 1회 걷어 찼고 제가 의자에서 일어나자 D가 오른쪽 어깨로 저의 등 부위를 세게 밀어서 제가 앞쪽으로 쓰러지려 다가 일어나니까 피고인 C가 주먹으로 저의 오른쪽 안면 부위를 1회 때라고 ’라고 진술하였다.
N stated the fact that he was assaulted by Defendant C after the lapse of ten (10) days after the occurrence of the case, and the father-do governor, who was assaulted by Defendant D, was identified as his father.
C) According to the recording paper (2) written by N, N is deemed to have taken the situation at the time of the cell phone camera immediately after considering the humfics, such as “N flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick
In addition, according to the above recording book (2), N is divided into the Defendants and the Defendants.
As stated in the phrase “,” it is not determined that Defendant D again committed an assault against Defendant C by drinking N in order for Defendant C to stand up with the n by pushing ahead with the n.
2) Examining the above judgment of the court below after comparing it with the records, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone alone that the defendants inflict bodily injury on N.
It is not sufficient to recognize otherwise.