Defendant

A A Fine of 2,00,000 won, Defendant B and Defendant D of each fine of 300,000,000 won, Defendant E, F and G of each fine.

(b) was on the N’s bridge, going beyond the chair;

’(증거목록 25번 K지회관련 상황일지 중 199쪽)고 기재되어 있고 N의 발목부위가 멍든 것으로 보이는 사진이 첨부되어 있다(증거기록 205쪽). N는 2014. 5. 27. 경찰에서 조사받을 당시에는 ‘D가 욕설을 하면서 제가 앉아 있는 의자를 발로 차더니 발로 저의 우측 정강이 부위를 1회 걷어 찼고 제가 의자에서 일어나자 D가 오른쪽 어깨로 저의 등 부위를 세게 밀어서 제가 앞쪽으로 쓰러지려다가 일어나니까 피고인 C가 주먹으로 저의 오른쪽 안면부위를 1회 때라고'라고 진술하였다.

N stated the fact that he was assaulted by Defendant C after the lapse of ten (10) days after the occurrence of the case, and the father-do governor, who was assaulted by Defendant D, was identified as his father.

According to the recording statement (2) submitted by N, N is deemed to have taken the situation at the time of the cell phone camera immediately after the defendant's d't see, e.g., ‘N', e., ‘N', this**', and see, e.g., the 34th page of the evidence list, the above recording, and 308 pages of the evidence record). However, according to this part of the facts charged, N was subject to assault by Defendant D when she takes the same bath from Defendant D, and thus, it is inconsistent with the circumstances shown in (2) above.

In addition, according to the above recording book (2), N is written that N is divided into those with the Defendants, and it is written that N is "Wednadna," and it is not determined that Defendant D is a situation in which Defendant C uses N in drinking, and it is not considered that Defendant C uses N again.

C. In conclusion, this part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a not-guilty verdict is rendered pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and a summary of this judgment is publicly announced pursuant to Article

2. Defendant G.