beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On May 15, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Changwon District Court’s branch on May 15, 2008, and on November 3, 2014, a summary order of KRW 3.5 million for the same crime from Changwon District Court’s Jinju branch on November 3, 201.
[Criminal facts]
1. On March 7, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (after-accidents), was a person engaging in driving service of BSM5 automobiles, and the Defendant was driving in the direction of Tcheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si.
At the time, the driver of a motor vehicle was at night and at the same time at a private distance crossing, and thus, the driver of a motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the front right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care
Nevertheless, as the Defendant neglected this, while driving a red signal while under the influence of 0.163% alcohol in blood, the Defendant was negligent in driving the signal at the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle of the victim C(44 ) driving, which was in the atmosphere, and received the amnesty from the Defendant’s right side and then received the amnesty.
Ultimately, the Defendant destroyed the damaged vehicle by occupational negligence in order to repair the 1,426,656 won, and left the scene without immediately stopping the vehicle and taking necessary measures.
2. On March 7, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of at least 0.163% from the 2km section of approximately 2km to the 3rd distance of Kacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-do, Sacheon-do, Seoul, for the same day, on March 7, 2018.
Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition on drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. The defendant;