logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.07.21 2015누48848
증여세등부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the addition of some contents, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article

The following matters shall be added to the 7th judgment of the first instance. The following matters shall be added to the 9th judgment:

【Plaintiff asserts to the effect that KRW 683,720,695 deposited in the new bank account under the name of the inheritee was deposited in C, and that the account of the inheritee was merely used as a Do official to pay the Plaintiff the instant amount. However, considering the following facts as a whole: Gap evidence 6, Gap evidence 21, Eul evidence 33,34, Eul evidence 1-1, 2, and Eul evidence 8, the Defendant’s new bank account (K)’s remaining KRW 643,720,695 and KRW 400,000 were deposited in 686, 7066, 7065, 706, 705, 7066, 705, 7065, 706, 705, 7065, 706, 706, 705, 700, 706, 706, 706, 706, 756, 16366, .7

As to this, the Plaintiff’s above 245,00 won.

arrow