logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고단1109
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person whose accurate name was introduced as “C Company D” (hereinafter “Name D”) to the effect that “I would withdraw money from a party’s account because it is not a legitimate method,” and (b) knowingly, I would like to withdraw money from a party’s account; (c) knowingly, I would like to prevent Bosing from committing Bosing crimes using the Defendant’s account; and (d) notified the account number of the new bank account (Account Number: E) in the name of the Defendant to the Non-Party 1.

In addition, at around 10:00 on April 9, 2015, the name omitted 1 introduced the victim F by telephone to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and introduced him/her as the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service. "As there are many persons suffering from damage caused by thm fraud, I opened a new passbook of the Gwangju Bank and made all deposits after making all deposits," and acquired financial information, such as the account number and password of the Gwangju Bank account newly established from the victim.

However, the above fact was that the victim was not an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, but the OTP number acquired from the victim by deceiving the victim was entered in the data processing device, such as a computer, and transferred money to the above account in the name of the defendant, and the victim was false for the purpose of receiving money from the defendant.

On April 9, 2015, at least 11:20 on April 9, 2015, the name omitted 1 transferred KRW 20 million from the victim's account to the above new bank account of the defendant, and KRW 5.8 million from the new bank account under the name of G to the above new bank account of the defendant, and withdrawn KRW 20 million from the defendant by telephone to the defendant in cash and then called "I agent".

Accordingly, the Defendant’s accurate name at around 13:50 on April 9, 2015 does not exceed “I’s agency,” where it is impossible to identify the exact name.

arrow