logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.05.08 2015고단503
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above imprisonment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 Highest 503] On February 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with only one cell phone of Samsung Ggallon in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,00,000,000, which was set aside on the store calculation unit for filling by the victim F, who is an employee of the above store, at D department store Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 14:00 on February 14, 2015.

In addition, the defendant from February 25, 2015 to the same year.

3. By March 3, 200, the victim’s cell phone market value of 4,949,000 won, such as the annexed list of crimes, was stolen.

[2015 Height745] On March 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at a h5-story store located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, G, the victim I, an employee of the above store, found the amount of KRW 1 million in the gallon 2 smartphone market, which was set aside by the above store's chairs, and stolen the victim's cresh in the victim's place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of J, K, L, M, F, and I;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Records of seizure, lists of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs and theft inquiries;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is deemed to have committed the crime of this case even though the defendant had the record of punishment for the same kind of crime several times, considering the fact that the defendant is recognized to have committed the crime of this case, but the defendant has violated his/her wrongness, there is no record of punishment for the defendant, and some of the damaged items have been temporarily returned and recovered,

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow