logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.08.22 2018고단51
보조금관리에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, he/she shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From January 18, 2014, Defendants A and C represent the members of the fishing village fraternity of Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City from around January 18, 201, and represent the members of the fishing village fraternity and exercise overall control over the promotion of the fishing village fraternity or the management of profit-making business; Defendants B, C, and C are persons operating the K of the civil engineering design service chain in 145-113 of the J-Gu building 145-Gu, Busan Metropolitan City, and Defendant B was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment for the crime of giving bribe at the Busan District Court on September 27, 2017 and the above sentence became final and conclusive on October 11 of the same year.

2. Criminal facts;

A. On June 29, 2015, Defendant A received subsidies of KRW 135 million from the Gangseo-gu Office of Busan, Busan, for the purpose of generating a food and experience for fishing village fishing village fraternities in the name of Defendant for the purpose of drinking fishing village fraternities and creating a experience site in the Gangseo-gu Busan, Gangseo-gu L site, Busan, and received subsidies of KRW 135 million from the Defendant. The same year:

7.1. Around July 1, 200 won subsidies of KRW 64,496,690 in total over 11 times from that time to December 7 of the same year, as shown in Appendix 1, including the Defendant’s personal use of KRW 500,00 for other purposes.

B. Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D were not administrative private roads, but not registered with the Minister of Marine Affairs in order to conduct a business that vicariously prepares an impact assessment report on the use of the sea, and even if they were not registered with the Special Metropolitan City Mayor, Metropolitan City Mayor, Special Self-Governing City Mayor, Do governor, or Special Self-Governing Province branch by field of construction technology service ordered by the State and local governments, Defendant C operated the above K together with the work of preparing working drawings, drawings, volume calculation documents, construction cost specifications, Defendant D’s numerical model experiments, preparation of consultation on the use of the sea, Defendant B’s preparation of a final report on the results of comprehensive management plans, basic plans, etc., and preparation of an impact assessment report on the use of the sea by proxy.

arrow