The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. At around 03:20 on April 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) went away from the IK-5 vehicles owned by the Defendant on the ground that one of the following: (b) while working on the road in front of the Dawa Holdings (24) located in the Gunsan City, the Defendant: (c) took a bath to the Defendant’s vehicle; and (d) taken away a G food vehicle owned by the Victim F (27) driven by the Victim E.

The defendant driving the above K5 vehicle, which is a dangerous object, and turns over the center line the four-lane road including the left-hand turn.

The victim E, who is driving a three-lane, has overtaken the above food operation vehicle and obstructed the front and obstructed the front, and then the above food operation vehicle has gone into two-lanes in the direction of the operation, and the above food operation vehicle, using the above K5 vehicle, had the front part of the front part of the food operation vehicle go into the front part of the K5 vehicle and had the above food operation vehicle go into the front part of the K5 vehicle, and faced with the opposite part.

Accordingly, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim E, who is the driver of the above food operation vehicle, on the knee knee knee knee that requires treatment for about two weeks, and on the knee kne kne knee kne kne kne kne that requires treatment for about two weeks to the victim J (Y, 20 years of age) who is the kne kne knee kne kne kne, and on the kne kne kne kne kne kne that requires treatment for about ten days to the victim F.

2. The Defendant asserts that it is not intentional to cause a traffic accident.

As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, E’s statement and report on investigation (related to shocking of accident vehicles) are made as the driver of a food tank (hereinafter referred to as “victim”).

In the first place, in the investigative agency and in this court, the vehicle of the defendant's K5 vehicle(hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant's vehicle") was driven by the defendant's vehicle in three lanes, and the vehicle of the defendant's vehicle in which the defendant's vehicle is about to be driven by the driver's vehicle was driven by the two lanes, and the vehicle of the defendant's vehicle was driven by the two lanes.