logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.01.22 2014고정1523
상해
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The acquittal portion

1. The Defendant: (a) around October 29, 2013, on the grounds that at the front parking lot of the commercial complex of Pyeongtaek-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, the Defendant: (b) inflicted an injury on the victim, i.e., the victim’s right-free knee-deed kne-deed kne-deed kne-deed kne-deed kne-deed kne-deed kne-deed kne-deed kne-deed k

2. In light of the judgment, there is a statement and a medical certificate by the victim as evidence that seems to correspond to the above facts charged.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the record are as follows: ① The victim stated in this court that the defendant was guilty of being pushed a wheelchairs, but the victim stated that the defendant was guilty of violence from E before being pushed, ② Police Officer G belonging to the F District of the Daejeon Police Station, the Daejeon Police Station, which was called to the scene at the time, contacted the victim by using a wheelchairs fishing, but the defendant stated that the wheel chairs was not sufficient to have the victim injured the above part of the bridge, but the degree of the wheel was so minor that the victim was not injured; ③ The victim received medical treatment at the H Family Board 15 days or past November 14, 2013 from the instant case, and the victim appears to have stated that the victim was injured. Considering that the above evidence alone, it is difficult to readily conclude that the victim suffered injury, such as slock, slock, and skinite, etc., which require three weeks of medical treatment due to the defendant’s act.

Thus, the above facts charged should be pronounced not guilty pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act because it constitutes a case where there is no proof of a crime. However, as long as the public prosecution is dismissed as follows with regard to the violence included in the above facts charged, the judgment of

Since the facts charged as to the injury of this case are included in the facts charged of assault, this part of the indictment.

arrow