A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA car.

Around 02:00 on December 8, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car and proceeded to the left at the 4th parallel of the shot line located in 208 Simnam-si, with the alteration of the Mannam-si, by making a left turn. On the part of the victim E (the 32 years old, female) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the new subparagraph, went to the front right side of the said car, the Defendant left the bridge of the victim E (the 32 years old, female) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the new subparagraph, without taking any necessary measures, such as aiding the victim and aiding the victim for about three weeks of medical treatment, and the Defendant immediately stopped the vehicle and escaped without taking any necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A traffic accident investigation report;

1. Results of fact inquiry about the National Health Insurance Corporation;

1. The defendant asserts that, at the time of the accident, the defendant should be acquitted of the defendant on the ground that he did not get the victim aboard because he did not get the victim away from the scene, and that the defendant did not have the intention of escape, and that the victim cannot be deemed to have suffered bodily injury under the Criminal Act due to the accident in the case.

First, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence and pleadings as to whether the defendant had an intention to escape at the time of the case, it is deemed that the defendant had an intention to escape.

In other words, the defendant stated to the effect that "the defendant was snicked in the entrance of the defendant, and the defendant was snicked, but was snicked by the victim while trying to leave the crosswalk without stopping the vehicle even though the victim was shocked according to the pedestrian signal," and that "the victim was snicked in the entrance of the defendant, and the defendant was snicked, but could not leave the defendant's vehicle because he was snicked." At that time, the defendant was two new walls.