Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won for a limited partnership company of the defendant in six months of imprisonment.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of the limited partnership company B located in D in Gangwon-do, and the defendant limited partnership company B is a corporation whose main business is the free manufacturing business.

1. No person who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities in the Republic of Korea shall employ any foreigner;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without having the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities at the above B office, employed 21 Thailand, who did not hold the domestic status of stay as shown in the separate list of crimes, from June 25, 2014 to July 14, 2015, including employment of a foreigner of Thailand’s nationality who entered the Republic of Korea on June 25, 2014, from June 2014 to July 2015, without obtaining the status of stay eligible for visa exemption (B-1).

As a result, the defendant employed a foreigner who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities.

2. At the time and place specified in Paragraph B(1) of the Defendant Limited Partnership Company, A, the representative of the Defendant, committed an offense regarding the Defendant’s business as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Accusation against an immigration offender, and written opinions;

1. Certificates for employment of foreigners, lists of the foreigners employed by the employees, and copies of business registration certificates;

1. A copy of a decision on examination, copy of decision on examination, and immigration offender's passport;

1. Copy of the written statement;

1. Application of statutes governing certified transcript of corporate register;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act (Selection of Imprisonment): Subparagraph 2 of Article 99-3 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the same Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act;

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation Defendant A: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant limited partnership company B: The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is without status of stay.