1. Of the part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment of the court of first instance, the following amount of money ordered to be paid is the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The first instance court accepted part of the Plaintiff A’s main claim, and dismissed both Plaintiff A’s remaining main claim, Plaintiff A’s main claim, Plaintiff B’s main claim, and Defendant’s counterclaim claim against the Plaintiffs.

Since only the Defendant appealed against the part of the Plaintiff’s principal lawsuit and the part of the counterclaim against the Plaintiffs, this Court’s judgment is limited to the part of Plaintiff A’s principal lawsuit and the part of the Defendant’s counterclaim against the Plaintiffs.

The main lawsuit and counterclaim shall be judged together.

2. The reasoning for this part of this Court is as follows, and the reasoning for this Court’s reasoning is as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance except for those recorded as follows. Thus, this part of the reasoning is cited by including a summary pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the

The third class "Plaintiff Company" shall be incorporated into "Plaintiff AB" (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff Company").

Part 3 16 to 4 shall be written in the following manner:

The defendant claimed for personnel expenses for Kimpo and G works against the plaintiff, and claimed for personnel expenses for H works against the plaintiff company.

By June 30, 2014, the Plaintiffs paid personnel expenses to the Defendant upon the Defendant’s claim.

3. The reasoning of the judgment on the plaintiff A's main claim is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for cases where the plaintiff's main claim is used or added as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 9, Part 20, Part 5, Part 3 "Plaintiff I" shall be added to "Plaintiff A".

In the end of Part 5, “The defendant was paid KRW 359,506,80 by the plaintiff, and the above amount was 2,817 (= there is no evidence to prove the fact that the number of the defendant Kimpo Corporation employees 2,664 did not reach the personnel expenses of the G Corporation 153)” at the end of Part 4.

Following the 6th page “2,64” = 2,864, Plaintiff A’s assertion - 20, and Plaintiff.