A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 25, 2017, at around 02:06, the Defendant: (a) had a dispute with a customer who had drinking in the said main point under the influence of alcohol while drinking alcohol with a fluor; (b) had the victim’s restraint; (c) had the victim talked with his/her voice; and (d) had the victim been able to return home from the border F, etc. belonging to the Nam-gu Incheon Southern Police Station E District of Incheon, which had been dispatched after receiving a report 112, continued to interfere with the victim’s work by force by avoiding disturbance, such as making a sound and taking a bath within the said main point.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (the following conditions favorable to the sentencing) was that the Defendant, while having been punished four times for violent crimes, has obstructed the business of the victim by taking a bath to the police despite the police’s request for returning home in spite of the police’s demand, and thereby obstructing the victim’s business by pricing the business door door of the victim’s drinking.

However, since the defendant's obstruction of business does not exceed 40 minutes and the damage to the victim is not large, the execution will be suspended.