A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From April 2013 to December 2015, the Defendant, who worked as a contracting officer at the C administrative team from around December 2015, was aware of the password of the entrance door. On September 2016, the Defendant had intruded into the said C office, and had a view to theft of the printers located therein.

1. On September 11, 2016, around 07:24, the Defendant infringed upon a structure, at the front of the C administrative team office of the victim E located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the Defendant divided the entrance password to cut off the door, opened the entrance, and intruded into the said office on eight occasions from the time until July 1, 2017, including the intrusion into the said office.

2. From September 11, 2016, around 07:24, the Defendant: (a) cited at the office of the administrative team office of the above C, the sum total of KRW 2,762,00 in the 12 market price of the victim E’s possession on a glar; and (b) stolen it from that time until July 1, 2017, up to 07:00, the Defendant stolen eight times, including the sum total of KRW 12,106,00 in the flickter width of the victim’s possession, including the sum total of KRW 56 in the list of crimes, as indicated in the list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution (including the F substitute part);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of G or F;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Account transactions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (related to confirmation at the scene of occurrence);

1. Relevant Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intrusion upon each structure), Article 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. On July 6, 2010, the defendant with reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act was sentenced to a fine of four million won by larceny, etc. at the high military court of the Ministry of National Defense, such as the Ministry of National Defense.

The defendant intrudes the place where he had worked in person over several times.