logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2017.02.09 2016나10863
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part that is amended or added in paragraph (2) below, and thus, the relevant statement is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The following parts are added to the portion to be altered or added, No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “(2)”. On June 11, 2012, F issued to Defendant D a written confirmation of debt (Evidence B) with the content that “F is liable for dividends of KRW 530 million in total under a business agreement dated January 29, 2010 (i.e., outstanding investment amounting to KRW 290 million) (i., KRW 120 million in dividends of KRW 290 million in 2010).

"No. 16" is added to the 6th sentence of the first instance judgment. The 6th sentence of the first instance judgment "No. 10,000 won" is added to the 10th sentence "project agreement (Evidence No. 19, Evidence No. 8-1)". The part of the 17 and No. 18 of the 6th sentence "No. 43 of the 19th sentence is merely the unilateral testimony of H who is a party to the said project agreement, and it is difficult to believe that the 60,000 won of the 10,000 won of the 10,000 won of the 6th sentence. The witness of the first instance judgment "No. 43 of the 19,000 won of the 10,000 won of the 19,000 won of the 19,000 won of the 19,000 won of the 19,000 won of the 20,000.

arrow