logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2016.07.12 2015가단9750
보증채무금
Text

1. Within the scope of each inherited property from the deceased I and the deceased J, Defendant A, C, E, and F respectively, 4,66.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On June 24, 1997, the Plaintiff lent KRW 20 million to Defendant B on June 24, 1997 at the due date of reimbursement of KRW 15% per annum, 199, and 19% per annum. The network I guaranteed Defendant B’s obligations to the Plaintiff within the limit of KRW 28 million.

B. The deceased on December 25, 1999, and on December 25, 199, the deceased transferred the deceased’s property to Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant E, Defendant F, and Network K, who are the wife J and their children.

C. Since then, the deceased J died on July 2, 2012, Defendant A, Defendant C, Defendant E, Defendant F, and K succeeded to the property of the deceased J. D.

After December 4, 2014, the network K died on December 4, 2014, and Defendant G and Defendant H inherited the property of the network K.

E. The plaintiff is the deceased I's A.

To the extent of inheritance from the deceased I and J against the defendants who inherited the nearest guarantee obligation, the above one is to the extent that it is inherited by the deceased I and J.

The performance of the obligation to the nearest to the port shall be sought.

2. Applicable provisions;

(a) Defendant A, B, C, and E: Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (a)

B. Defendant F, G, or H: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Service by public notice)

arrow