beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. As to the real estate listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 1, Defendant B:
B. The Defendants and the Defendants.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
(a) Changes in the ownership of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 shall be as listed in the separate sheet No. 2;
B. The date of death of the nominal owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 and inheritance relation 1) AK 1 and the parties concerned are the same person as AK 1, and there is no dispute as to this part. The parties concerned died on August 28, 1993. Accordingly, the Defendant C and their children, who were the Defendant C and their children, inherited the property of Defendant B, D, F, G (AL) and H, at the rate of 1.5:1:1:11:11:1.1 on February 4, 1995. 2) AM died on February 4, 1995, and accordingly, AM inherited the property of the Defendant (appointed parties) and the appointed parties, J, L, M, N, N,O, P, at the rate of 1/8 on each occasion.
(AM’s wifeN died on November 29, 2012. 3) AO died on November 2, 1993. Accordingly, the wife’s Y, Z, AA, and G (resident registration number: AB) succeeded to the net AO’s property at the rate of 1.5:1:1:1. (4) AP’s death, following the wife’s Appointor’s death, AH, AI, and AJ inherited the net AP’s property at the rate of 1.5:1:11.
5) A Q died on August 9, 2013, and R, S, G (Resident Registration Number: T), U, V, and W succeeds to the property of Q Q 1.5:1:1:1:1:1: 5:1:3) and 5, Q 1. G is all Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong. (c) The owners of each real estate listed in the attached Table 1 list were all deceased except AC and AF, and the subsequent details of shares by inheritance are as shown in the attached Tables 3 through 6’s shares calculation table. [Recognition] There is no dispute over the facts that Q Q 5 through 7, 8, 18, 20 through 22. The purport of each of subparagraphs 1, 1, 1, and 20 through 222 (including each number, each of subparagraph 1, and the purport of all of the arguments as a whole.
2. Determination as to the defendants' defense prior to the merits
A. Defendants 1, B, D, F, G, and H’s proof shall be in charge of AS, the conciliation division shall be in charge of ATS, and the division shall be in charge of the duties of the president, etc., even though the said Defendants were subordinate descendants of the Plaintiff, or in relation to the agenda or general assembly from the Plaintiff.