A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 23"

1. On September 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 20:55 on September 26, 2018, at the main point of “D” operated by the victim C(the age of 44) in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, without any particular reason, avoided disturbance; (b) as he was prevented by the victim; (c) sold the victim’s clothes once to the victim; and (d) took care of the victim’s face.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

2. At around 22:00 on September 26, 2018, the Defendant voluntarily driven at the F District District of the Ulsan-gu Police Station, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, for the same reason as the stated in paragraph (1), and refused to conduct an investigation, and took a bath for police officers while drinking home, the Defendant expressed that the Defendant she would be able to take a look at the time, while taking a bath to the said G, who is a police officer belonging to the said F District, she was able to take a back home from the said F District, and she expressed that the said G’s face level was “Chewing, Chewing,” and she was able to take a bath for returning home from the said police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of the above G crime, which is a police officer.

around 00:52 on March 13, 2019, the Defendant: (a) called “the Defendant is suffering from disturbance” from the emergency room of the police officer called “Ara, SM-N916K”) to the police officer outside of the emergency room after receiving a report, and then called “Ara, SM-N916K” to the police officer, and then cut off the smartphone ( Model Name SM-N916K) for the business purpose used by K used by the J police officer of the Ulsan-Namnam Police Station J District of the Ulsan-nam Police Station, the Defendant 22,00 won of the above smartphone’s surface was fladd, and damaged the case and liquid film so that the repair expenses amounting to KRW 22,00,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement related to C and G;

1. A written statement L or K;

1. On-site photographs, etc., related photographs, and damaged official smartphone photographs;

1. Analysis of CCTVs installed in investigation reports, damage amount of damaged public smartphones, and reimbursement of repair costs;