A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence Nos. 1 and 2 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

On March 16, 2014, the Defendant sold CD’D’s Mar. 16, 2014 to the victim E (n.e., 40 years of age) and did not receive 60 million won from the victim as the purchase price, and 24 million won from the victim as the price for the said marina goods.

Therefore, the Defendant: (a) prepared a process certificate of lending and borrowing contract with respect to the said money from the injured party; and (b) seized movable property in the said marina, etc.; but (c) on February 14, 2015, the victim was unable to achieve most of the objective of compulsory execution on the wind that transferred the said money to F.

Accordingly, on February 19, 2016, the Defendant filed a complaint with the Seoul Southern Police Station as a crime of escape from fraud and compulsory execution against the victim, but notified that the above case was sent to the prosecutor's office without suspicion and received notification that it was sent to the prosecutor's office. At that time, the Defendant received notification of determination from the female-child district due to money problem, and all of the victims were the victim

I think, on June 12, 2016, 08:00 around 08:0, 12, 2016, the knife knife knife (23cm in total length, 12cm in knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

At around 11:30 on the same day while waiting for a victim in the vicinity of the above church, the defendant 1 met the victim's obligation by reporting that the victim parked and walked his vehicle in the vicinity of the above church, and urgings the victim to repay his obligation, but he saw that the victim does not have any money from the victim, and takes the knife of the above knife, which is a dangerous object that was driven at the hume, with the victim's knife with the victim's above knife, which was a dangerous object that was driven at the hume, and violated the part below the victim's left eye on twice.

Then, the defendant continued to pay his obligation to the victim who is faced with the face of the knife, while taking one time the victim's head into consideration.