logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.25 2014가단5248461
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 24,56,890 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 16, 2015 to January 25, 2016, and the following.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The mother, the Defendant, and C are the birth of the Plaintiff’s children.

B. C received financial support from the Plaintiff and operated a real estate real estate agent office under Article 106 of the first floor 106 of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D's Da, but due to the business depression, due to the failure to pay rent and management expenses, C was placed in the situation where the facility and the premium would be lost. The Defendant, who operated the real estate broker office in another place, decided to take over the said office.

C. As of November 14, 2005, the Defendant: (a) as of November 14, 2005, borrowed the amount of KRW 20 million (20,000,000) to A as the deposit for commercial buildings D 106; and (b) promised to pay A the amount of KRW 20,000 (20,000) in return for the promise to pay the premium to A at the time of selling it; (c) make a promise to pay the amount of KRW 20,000 (20,000) in return (3 months: 40,000:0,000) (hereinafter “the instant loan certificate”).

As of the same day, “A” and “A” and “A(A) are completely terminated on the condition that all credit and debt relationships between B(B) and C(A) are entrusted with D shop premium, and “B(B) and C(S) are completely terminated, and documents signed and signed and written by C(A3) are written.

The defendant transferred the above office to another office around 2009.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 3 evidence, Eul 3 evidence, Eul's testimony, Eul's whole purport of pleading

2. The assertion and judgment

A. (1) The Plaintiff’s assertion regarding the cause of the claim is the sum of KRW 20 million and KRW 20 million paid by the Defendant to the Defendant with the remainder of the lease deposit and KRW 20 million paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant, while the Plaintiff’s real estate real estate real estate agent office operated by C with funding.

arrow