1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Summary of both claims;

A. The Plaintiff, which caused the Plaintiff’s claim, concluded a commodity supply contract with the Defendant and the Plaintiff to supply the automobile equipment parts to the Defendant.

From March 30, 2009 to February 27, 2010, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with goods equivalent to KRW 270,875,000 as indicated in the list of the details of the Plaintiff’s transactions, and received KRW 12,763,00 out of the price of the goods from the Defendant.

(2) On March 30, 209, 10, 20, 30, 20, 20, 30, 20, 30, 100, 20, 30, 200, 20, 30, 200, 30, 200, 20, 30, 200, 30, 200, 30, 200, 20, 30, 100, 30, 200, 20, 30, 100, 20, 30, 100, 20, 30, 100, 20, 30, 100, 20, 30,000, 30,000, 20,000, 10,000,00

B. The plaintiff alleged by the defendant had supplied the defendant with goods equivalent to KRW 19,943,00 in total among the goods Nos. 3, 5 and 6, and 9, and the goods equivalent to KRW 19,943,00 in total among the goods Nos. 11, 11. However, as claimed by the plaintiff, the goods equivalent to KRW 270,875,000 are equivalent to KRW 270,875,00.