beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal record] On October 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Seoul Southern District Court for fraud, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 7, 2015.
[2] The Defendant, at around 19:00 on July 1, 2015, 2015, at Seoul Franz., the Defendant: (a) sent 24 tons of the PIPS-free toxic product to the victim B by phone in spite of the fact that the Defendant did not have any intent to secure and supply the Defendant’s debt, etc. even if having received money under the name of the purchase price of the product; and (b) did not have any specific property, he/she did not have any intent to secure and supply the product; and (c) he/she could supply the product that was sold for KRW 1,350 per kilogram, but ordinarily, to KRW 1,100 per kilogramz. 288 million to transfer the product to the Defendant.
Note .
From the end of July 2, 2015, “A” made a false statement to the effect that he/she received KRW 28.8 million from the injured party to the Defendant’s wife C’s account at around 11:37, 2015, and acquired it by fraud.
The defendant of "2015 Highest 4736" is a person who operates a manufacturer of plastic ingredients with a trade name D Co., Ltd.
1. On March 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, at the business division office of the Victim E Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., the Defendant: (b) around 10, 2015, at the victim E Co., Ltd.’s business division office, the Defendant: (c) stated that “At present, the Defendant had 40 tons in the Gu and 90 tons in the ceiling, each of which has 130 tons of PP raw materials; and (d) can be delivered immediately after the following day to E, to transfer the price of KRW 120 million.”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not actually own or keep the above 130 tons of PP raw materials and used them at the place where the Defendant paid the price for the goods from the injured party and paid the price for the goods, so even if he received the above payment from the injured party, he did not have the ability or intent to deliver the above PP raw materials to the injured party.
The defendant.