Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for eight months, respectively.

(2) from the date of this judgment;

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On June 7, 2018, the Daejeon District Court was sentenced to imprisonment for three years and six months for a crime of fraud, such as computer, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 15, 2018.

The Defendants received money from the branch in return for the business fund and conspired to use it as gambling funds, living expenses, etc.

1. On May 2016, the Defendants’ fraud against the victim C is about to expand the siren project to the victim, who was Defendant B’s right back to the end at the siren business office operated by the Defendants in Jindo-si, Jindo-si.

It is expected to place a job in our office.

In short of business funds, if a loan is granted from a lending company to us, the interest shall be paid by us within three months, and the principal shall be paid within three months and the additional three million won shall be paid.

However, in fact, even if the Defendants borrowed money from the injured party, they merely attempted to use it as her name, bridge game gambling funds, living expenses, etc., and did not have the intent or ability to use it as her own business funds, and there was no intention or ability to pay the principal and interest within 3 months.

Ultimately, in collusion, the Defendants, by deceiving the victim as above, received the total sum of KRW 2,980,000,000 from the victim to the E bank account under the name of the Defendant A on May 24, 2016 and KRW 2,298,00,000,000,000 from May 25, 2016.

2. The Defendants against the victim F are trying to expand the siren service to the victim, who was the second flag of the Defendants, at the Defendant’s residence located in Jin-si, Jin-si around June 2016.

In short of business funds, the loan company received a loan from the lending company and borrowed the loan to us, thereby causing certain profits and making the principal repayment within 3 months.

However, in fact, even if the Defendants borrow money from the injured party, they immediately refer to the name of the bridge.