1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows, including the Plaintiff’s claim modified in the trial.

1. The facts following the facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be found in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 8, 16, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 7 (including branch numbers), and witness testimony of the first instance court H as a whole.

1) The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s establishment of a MOU and a lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, etc. 1) C Campus (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s University”).

(2) On June 2013, the Plaintiff established and operated a consulting company D, by requesting services related to the establishment of a strategy for the development of Plaintiff’s university, including securing financial soundness. Around June 2013, the Plaintiff’s university entered into an MOU with the Defendant on June 21, 2013, with a view to ensuring financial soundness, including the implementation and circulation of the Credit Bank System, and the establishment of a lifelong education institute in neighboring cities, such as Ulsan. (2) The Plaintiff’s university entered into an MOU with the Defendant on June 21, 2013, with a view to creating a foundation for promoting lifelong education in the port area and establishing a mutual organic cooperation system.

3) On August 1, 2013, the Defendant’s representative E is the F annexed to the Plaintiff’s University Lifelong Education Institute (hereinafter “F”) to be newly established for two years from August 1, 2013 to July 31, 2015.

A) Around October 2013, the Plaintiff was appointed as an invited professor for industry-academic cooperation (hereinafter referred to as the “instant lease”). Around October 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a real estate lease agreement with the Defendant for the lease of 3 and 4 floors (hereinafter referred to as “the instant building”) from the North-gu G ground building (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) owned by the Defendant for a fixed period of 60 months from September 1, 2013 to August 31, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as “instant lease”). The Plaintiff entered into an annual rental fee (including KRW 5AT), and the annual rental fee (including KRW 5AT), and the timing and method of payment (including KRW 120,000,000,000,000) for each of the following years (including KRW 10,000,000,000).