The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is the representative director of the Company B and the victim C (the age of 47) are the same employees of the same Company.

At around 08:25 on March 11, 2020, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s attitude of working at the meeting room on the first floor of the company located in Ansan-si, a member-gu, an Ansan-si; (b) expressed the victim’s desire to “this fright” on the ground that the victim was her tending to her fright at the meeting; (c) threatened the victim with her fright, threatening the victim’s floth, and her floth with his her hand, and assaulted the victim’s floth.

2. The crime indicated in the facts charged in the instant case constitutes the crime of non-compliance under Article 260(1) and (3) of the Criminal Act.

However, it is obvious that the victim expressed his intention not to have the criminal defendant punished after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.