The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who is the B apartment C Dong-dong representative.

On September 21, 2018, the Defendant committed violence against the victim of the document file for approval, which was cited as the "le interest-based child, ageless gu gu gu gu gu lae" among disputes with the victim E during the Dong representative meeting related to the replacement of automatic text according to the relevant apartment long-term repair plan, at the meeting of the office of the office of the management office of the apartment of Yeongdeungpo-gu Ga-gu Ga-gu Ga-gu 201.

2. The above facts charged cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, and according to the records of this case, it is apparent that the victim E expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant after the institution of the prosecution of this case. Thus, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.