logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.24 2017고단4718
개인정보보호법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was dispatched to ITF's business innovation team in the related private sector of the LAF and was in charge of the program related to the determination of telecommunication fees and other content development.

A person who manages or has processed personal information shall not damage, destroy, alter, forge, or leak any third person's personal information without due authority or beyond the permitted authority.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, notified the late center service provider of the information on telephone numbers (name, resident number, and fee hearing address) by using the circumstances that he/she is in charge of developing the E’s program related to the determination of telecommunications rates and other content and has the authority to search or inquire about the information of the subscribers to the E for the development and test of the program and to receive a certain amount of consideration.

On January 2, 2017, at the IT Team office located on the 11th floor of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building G, the Defendant received a request from the J to provide information on the subscriber to a specific telephone number. At around 21:26 on the same day, the Defendant’s home, at around 21:26, connected the Defendant’s home, to J, which is a E contents development program using a computer, using the computer, searched the subscriber’s information on the requested telephone number through the management screen, and provided the results to H, “K, L, Incheon Jung-gu, Ma, Kakaooo,” which is the result.

As a result, the Defendant managed personal information and leaked another person's personal information beyond the permitted authority.

From that time until June 23, 2017, the Defendant provided and leaked 119 personal information of another person to H and his/her employees N in the aforementioned manner, such as as indicated in the list of offenses in attached Form 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1.Each of H and N.

arrow