Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 5, 2018, the Defendant committed sexual abuse, such as sexual harassment, etc. that may cause a sense of sexual humiliation, against a child, on the following grounds: (a) around 08:45 on June 5, 2018: (b) the victim C (hereinafter referred to as “the 15-year-old age”) who passed the crime to attend school; and (c) the victim C (hereinafter referred to as “the 15-year-old age”) was sexually abused.

2. On September 1, 2018, the Defendant committed sexual abuse, such as sexual harassment, etc. that causes a sense of sexual humiliation to children, on September 1, 2018, at around 08:45, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim who was off from a knife with a knife in order to attend the said place; and (b) reported the victim’s knife with a knife with a knife.

3. On October 23, 2018, the Defendant committed sexual abuse, such as sexual harassment, etc. that may cause a sense of sexual humiliation, against a child, on October 23, 2018, on the following grounds: (a) around October 23, 2018, the Defendant only used the victim’s side, and (b) the victim “I want to promptly do so, and I want to promptly do so.”

4. On October 24, 2018, the Defendant committed sexual abuse, such as sexual harassment, which causes a sense of sexual shame to children, on October 24, 2018, on the ground that, around 08:45, the Defendant stated that “I would like to put his/her fingers in a sexual legate” to the victim before the stairs connected to the F Park of the E-dong, Dong-dong, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. On October 23 to 25, 2018, the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion is not accepted, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court: (a) the content of the Defendant’s legal statement in C Kakakao Stockholm conversation; (b) the 112 reported case processing table; (c) the on-site photograph; (d) the suspect photograph; and (e) the CCTV images for each crime prevention; and (e) the photograph of the Defendant [the Defendant and his defense counsel did not have any act of sexual harassment as stated in the judgment; or (e) the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion is sufficiently recognized.”