logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1994. 10. 25. 선고 94도1819 판결
[사기미수][공1994.12.1.(981),3166]
Main Issues

Requirements for establishing lawsuit fraud crime

Summary of Judgment

In order to establish fraud in a lawsuit fraud, it is insufficient to establish fraud only by the fact that there is no right as alleged at the time of filing the lawsuit, and even if it is well known that there is no right to assert, it is necessary to perceive the court by false assertion and proof, and the act of filing the lawsuit is not a fraud.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 347 of the Criminal Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 83Do973 delivered on April 24, 1984 (Gong1984, 943) 91Do2427 delivered on April 10, 1992 (Gong1992, 1637) 93Do1941 delivered on September 28, 1993 (Gong193Ha, 3018)

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Prosecutor

Judgment of the lower court

Daegu District Court Decision 93No2265 delivered on May 26, 1994

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

We examine the grounds of appeal.

In order to establish fraud in a lawsuit fraud, it is insufficient to establish fraud only by the fact that there is no right as alleged at the time of filing the lawsuit, and even if it is well known that there is no right to assert, it is necessary to perceive the court by false assertion and proof, and the act of filing the lawsuit is not a fraud.

The court below rejected the evidence attached to the facts charged that the defendant raised a civil lawsuit by claiming the acquisition of the forest of this case by the intention of acquiring by registering the ownership of the forest of this case under his own name with the awareness that the forest of this case is owned by the State, and acquitted the defendant on the ground that there is no proof of the crime. In light of relevant evidence and records, such recognition and decision of the court below is just, and there is no error of law that found the facts erroneous in violation of the rules of evidence such as the theory

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Jeong Jong-ho (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-대구지방법원 1994.5.26.선고 93노2265