logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.03.31 2015고정2372
식품위생법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates the Internet shopping mall in the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government second floor.

No one shall place an advertisement with food, etc. that has efficacy or effect in preventing and treating diseases, or that is likely to mislead or confuse as medicine or health functional foods.

From April 2015 to June 2015, the Defendant sold “GMP” products, a general food, through the Internet shopping mall site (D) and created “GMP,” “GMP,” “MP, glus, and non-resident B2,” based on Aminmination and nutrition injection;

Therefore, if a house 2 mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar.

The room may be available.

“The advertisement using the phrase “,” made an advertisement that is a general food, such as advertising, has efficacy and effect in preventing and treating diseases, or that is likely to mislead or confuse the said product as a medicine or health functional food.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record (a statement to the effect that an advertisement has been published);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of the statutes on the screen of the advertisement closure;

1. Relevant Article of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Article 94 (1) 2-2 of the Food Sanitation Act, and Article 13 (1) 1 (Selection of a punishment punishment) of the same Act on the selective crime;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (limited to the posting of the advertisement produced by a product supplier rather than the advertisement produced by the Defendant himself, the period for which the advertisement was posted was not long, and the Defendant has no previous conviction).

arrow