logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.06.08 2018고단254
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 16, 2018, at around 02:30, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the market value by cutting off glass residues from the instant entertainment shop operated by the victim C, which was operated by the victim C, with a view to having broken himself/herself; (b) cutting off the glass residues from the said place to the wall; (c) cutting down the glass residues on the floor by cutting the glass residues on the floor; and (d) cutting down the glass residues on the floor by breaking it up to the door.

2. On March 16, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 03:03, on the front day of the pertinent D amusement shop; (b) on the front day of the pertinent D amusement shop, the Defendant: (c) left the police box G, etc. belonging to the police box of the former Police Station, who was called out after receiving the report of paragraph (1) 112, to take measures to have the Defendant invalid after paying the alcohol value; and (d) attempted to return to the Defendant; (c) the Defendant left the police box in his hand after blocking the defective patrol vehicle; and (d) the said G mets the said G, and (c) the Defendant met, “Csp

The bath theory called ", ......" was carried by hand his arms and flabbbage, and flabened with flab.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each statement of H;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The provision of the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (the punishment shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes with the punishment determined by a crime of interfering with the execution of heavier public duties);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following factors: (a) the victim and the victim who damaged the reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: (b) the victim and the victim have never agreed to do so; (c) the victim’s behavior is at all closed and reflected; and (d) the family relation is

arrow