1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. Of the litigation costs, the costs are between the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Defendant’s Intervenor and the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

Basic Facts

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) is the redevelopment partnership that promotes a housing redevelopment project in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government HJ large-scale 65,338 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project zone”), and the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) and the designated parties I, J, K, L, and M are the Intervenor’s members.

On October 19, 2006, the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City designated and publicly announced the E urban renewal acceleration district in accordance with the Special Act on the Promotion of Urban Renewal (hereinafter “Urban Renewal Act”). On January 7, 2008, the designation of the E urban renewal acceleration district, the determination of the urban renewal acceleration plan and the preparation of topographic drawings was publicly announced. The instant project zone was designated as a G financial renewal acceleration district.

On December 3, 2008, the defendant approved the establishment of the intervenor association.

On October 21, 2010, the Mayor of Seoul Special Metropolitan City made a decision on the modification of the E-Urban Renewal Acceleration Plan (G zone) with respect to partial land use plan, population housing accommodation plan, etc. among the E-Urban Renewal Acceleration Plan and publicly announced topographic drawings

On August 22, 2014, the intervenor proposed to the defendant on August 22, 2014 the amendment of the G Area renewal acceleration plan, which contains changes to the land use plan, special-purpose area plan, infrastructure installation plan, construction plan, etc. concerning the project area

Pursuant to Article 9(3) of the Urban Renewal Act and Article 9(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, the Defendant made a public inspection and announcement of the alteration of the E urban renewal acceleration plan (G area) from December 18, 2014 to January 2, 2015, and followed the procedures for hearing opinions with respect to the Gu Council from January 30, 2015 to February 5, 2015.

On February 26, 2015, the defendant held a public hearing on the amendment of the above urban renewal acceleration plan, but it was no longer in opposition of the residents.

On April 4, 2015, pursuant to Article 9(3) of the Urban Renewal Act and Article 9(2) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, the Defendant publicly announced that a public hearing is held to hear the opinions of residents and interested parties, and F.