1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

Details of the disposition

On December 22, 2005, the Defendant designated Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, F, G Japan 226,478.5 square meters as H City Environment Improvement Zone (Public Notice I of Seoul Metropolitan Government), and on January 21, 2010, designated the above zone as D urban renewal acceleration district.

(J) The Seoul Metropolitan Government Notice No. D. The urban renewal acceleration district consists of 26 urban renewal acceleration districts from the KF promotion district to the LF promotion district, and the plaintiffs (appointed parties) and the designated parties M (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiffs") are the owners of land, etc. in the QV district, the urban environment improvement district of which is the urban environment improvement district of the NF 2,805 square meters in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the "O district", and the remaining district is also referred to as the same method) and the land of the plaintiffs is included in the main part of the instant case.

At least 30% of the owners of land, etc. in 15 urban renewal acceleration zones, including the O zone, among the 26 urban renewal acceleration zones in the D urban renewal acceleration districts, submitted a written consent for cancellation, and the approval of the committee for the promotion of urban environmental improvement cooperatives in the L district was revoked, the Defendant released the above 16 urban environmental improvement zone pursuant to Article 4-3 (1) and (4) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 13508, Sep. 1, 2015; hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”).

(E) On January 14, 2016, the Defendant integrated the S and T areas into S areas pursuant to Articles 5 and 12(1) of the Special Act on the Promotion of Urban Renewal (hereinafter “Urban Renewal Act”); and the Defendant modified the designation of an urban renewal acceleration plan in order to eliminate the infrastructure interruption of the seven areas (U and V areas, W areas, X areas, X areas, Y areas, Z areas, and S areas) as a result of the instant cancellation decision; and to secure entry roads; the key part of the instant case is attached Table 3 in the existing urban renewal acceleration plan (hereinafter “previous plan”).