logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.08.20 2014나22107
수익배분금 등
Text

1. All the Plaintiff’s appeal and the Plaintiff’s conjunctive claim added at the trial.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: the evidence of the first instance court's judgment No. 4, No. 15 of the first instance court's 4, " recognized based on each of the aforementioned grounds for recognition" are as follows: "The evidence of the first instance court's 2, No. 2-1, and No. 2, and evidence No. 2, and evidence of the second instance court's 7, No. 19 of the first instance court's 4, No. 18, and No. 19 of the first instance court's 4, No. 19 of the first instance court's 4, the second instance court's 4, and the second instance's 4, No. 19 of the first instance court's 4, the second instance court's 4, and the second instance's 1,

【The part used by G】 In light of the fact that G testified to the effect that “the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not work together” and “B” made a statement to the effect that “the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not work together,” and that G appeared as a witness in the trial and testified to the effect that “the Plaintiff and the Defendant would divide the end of each month into KRW 1:1,00,000, and the Defendant would bring about a further amount of KRW 2,000,000, in addition, it may be detailed how to divide the profits and the details of the distribution, and it shall not be divided into the amount with the same volume as the Plaintiff and the Defendant divided the profits from the same trade relationship.” In addition, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant did not pay all the Plaintiff’s fees for using the Plaintiff’s machinery and labor even though the Defendant could work in addition to the volume introduced by the Plaintiff’s machinery and labor force from April 2013 to July 2013.

Therefore, without any legal cause, the Defendant’s use of the machinery owned by the Plaintiff (3,203,100 won per month of the cost of mechanical lease x 4 months) and the Plaintiff’s wage 7,166,984 won per day x 81,443 won per day of urban daily wage of KRW 81,443.

arrow