The defendants shall all be acquitted. The defendants shall dismiss the application filed by the applicant for compensation.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is engaged in the development and production of food crushing processing equipment, and the victim C is a person who operates the F (State) of a heat recovery ventilation system manufacturing company.

Around May 201, the Defendant: (a) proposed that the victim, known through a grosator, transferred food that flavered through a grosator (hereinafter referred to as “flaver”) to a post-treatment device; (b) separated the food that flavers into body and liquid, thereby discharging liquid into sewerage; and (c) developed the food treatment system that flavers are processed by a waste disposal method by mixing it with drosium and drosium; (b) made and produced the frosator, produced and supplied the frosator to the apartment construction company in the name of F; and (c) concluded a collaboration contract with the victim around the 12th of the same month with the victim.

After that, the defendant has been given the same year.

9. From around 26. to December 28. 28 of the same year, while serving as a director in the above F (State) from around 26. The victim was deprived of the victim's complaint on the ground that the victim neglected the defendant, etc.

After that, around January 6, 2012, the Defendant sought a statement that “F (State) supplied ventilation system parts to the said F (State), etc. to the Incheon Eastern Office of Education, etc., and that “F (State) supplied the ventilation system parts to the Incheon Eastern Office of Education, etc., is not a certified product, and it has been returned after paying the part parts in installments,” and planned to receive money and valuables by threatening the victim by using such fact.

1. Around January 26, 2012, the Defendant filed a verbal civil petition with the purport that “Around January 26, 2012, the Defendant sought to the Dongbu District Office of Education in Incheon, and supplied H with a ventilation system, other than a certified product, in F”. From the foregoing H, the Defendant’s civil petition details were transferred to the victim, instead of the victim’s contact defect.