1. The Defendants are not guilty. 2. The summary of this judgment is published.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant B, on November 1, 2014, established a (ju) A for the purpose of developing and manufacturing dental image equipment on the F2th floor of the Masung-si, Masung-si, Masung-si, with the aim of developing and manufacturing dental equipment (the capital of KRW 860,000,000, and eight employees) and has served as a representative director until now.

Since the establishment of August 28, 2008 (including capital 1,000,000,000 won for employees, 8 employees) on the basis of H (hereinafter “H”)’s application technology, G (the State) has produced and developed a total of electronic guns using H by investing KRW 400 million in research development costs in around 2010, and continued to develop the “J” by purchasing the exclusive use right for the development of J-based industry-academic cooperation with the International University Industry-Academic Cooperation Organization around December 2013 and purchasing the exclusive use right of development at KRW 220,000.

The “J” means enabling the digital-type three-dimensional image systems by using an electronic gun using H, unlike the existing Arabic X-ray Pib, using an electronic generating device. In particular, the victimized company has been under a pledge of confidentiality when it enters into a contract with a collaborative company, and has been working in a reasonable manner to maintain business secrets, such as: first, in the process of the “J” production, the technology using the two-dimensional body body in the instant line; second, the technology using the three-wheeled body in the instant line; third, the technology with the three-dimensional line in the instant line in the direction of X-ray to release is not disclosed to the outside; third, the technology with the longer line in the direction of X-ray is not managed as business secrets; third, the inside server can be stored in the research server and accessible only by the person with authority to access the said technical data; and the injured company has been under a pledge of confidentiality when it enters into a contract with the collaborative company; and has made reasonable efforts to maintain business secrets.

On the other hand, on September 22, 2015, the Defendant would develop and sell dental X-ray using the “J” supplied by the victimized company with the said “J” and, on the other hand, would be supplied when the victimized company develops the “J”.