logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.28 2018고단6070
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인은 2018. 9. 11. 09:05 경 서울 영등포구 여의 나루로 40에 있는 지하철 9호 선 여의도 역 방면에서 동작 역 방면으로 진행하는 전동차 안에서 승객들이 많은 것을 이용하여 피해자 B( 여, 23세) 의 뒤에 바짝 붙어 서서 발기된 성기를 위 피해자의 엉덩이 부위에 갖다 대 었다가 뗐다를 반복하여 대중교통수단에서 피해자를 추행하였다.

2. On September 11, 2018, around 09:10, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in any means of public transportation on the part of the victim’s her her son’s her her her her her her her her her her son’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Photographss and video CDs by cutting down the course of a course;

1. The defendant asserts that he did not commit an indecent act against the victim as stated in paragraph (2) of this Article, such as a criminal fact.

However, according to the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the above argument is rejected, since the facts constituting the crime described in paragraph 2 are also recognized.

The victim of the crime stated in paragraph 1 (hereinafter “the primary victim”) stated very detailed and detailed statement about the contact situation with the defendant to the effect that “(the Defendant’s sexual flag was laid off) was laid solid about the situation at the time of the commission of the crime, and that the male’s buck part was not sealed in the macker, and that only part of the male was cut off, and that the macker’s part was adhered to the Defendant’s body.” The Defendant appears that the primary victim was dissurt to the Defendant’s body contact.

arrow