The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the following: (a) the summary of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel (unlawful in sentencing) recognizes the Defendant’s mistake and reflects the Defendant; (b) there is no record of criminal punishment; and (c) health status is not good, the lower court’s sentence imposing an order to provide community service for a period of one year, 3 years of suspended execution; (d) 80 hours of community service; and (e) sexual assault treatment lectures for a period

2. The crime of this case is not proper to be committed by the Defendant’s indecent act by force on several occasions by putting the damaged person’s employees on the wall of the store operated by the Defendant on the wall of singing, by putting them on the wall of the victim, or by putting the Defendant’s hand in the wall of the damaged person’s hand, etc., and putting the damaged person’s hand on the wall of the damaged person. The circumstances alleged in the grounds of appeal are that the lower court is already reflected in the sentencing, and there are no special changes in circumstances that may be considered in the first instance court. In full view of the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, environment, degree of damage, motive and circumstance of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and therefore, the above assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.